I’ve been thinking a good bit this weekend about the issue of “forcing” treatment upon mentally ill people, particularly those who are in immediate and ongoing danger of being hurt by their illness, or at risk of causing others to be hurt. OK, I confess–“Grizzly Man” is playing on cable this weekend, and Treadwell‘s story rips at my heart, because when you watch the footage of him, he is so obviously ill. Brilliant, creative, with a big heart…but sick. He was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and other things, but always refused treatment, and, I feel, ultimately died as a result of that refusal.
Have you heard or read about “Kendra’s Law?” If not, go check out this story, and see what you think. I’m really interested in hearing others’ thoughts on this topic. When I hear the term “forced treatment,” my mind immediately conjures up images from Ken Kesey’s novel “One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest”, and Jack Nicholson’s consequent film portrayal of its main character, who has “treatment” forced on him right up through lobotomy. But from what I can see right now, it apears that the goal of Kendra’s Law is just about the opposite of the nightmare created in”Cuckoo’s Nest.” It’s not about institutionalizing people, locking them up and keeping them in chemical straitjackets. It seems to seek to help people live connected, fulfilling, and maybe ironically, independent lives.
Consider the very nature of disorders like bipolar disorder and schizophrenia…they deny their own existence. That is actually a diagnostic criteria sometimes, which boggles my mind: “Oh, you don’t think you’re sick? Well, that PROVES you are.” Yikes! But in bipolar support groups, I have seen more heartache than I can stand to reflect on much, coming simply from the sick person’s lack of insight. I don’t really even like that term, “insight,” because it implies something you can choose to have, and for many mentally ill people, that choice just does not exist without medication. And to complete the catch-22, without insight, medication is never going to be chosen. So there you are, stuck in a truly vicious cycle. I’m not talking about people who don’t like meds, resent having to take meds, etc. I mean the greater-than-80% of affected people who cannot recognize that they have an illness. If you could, somehow, get proper medication into these people, then they would be able to achieve the insight they would need to recognize the need for the medication…see the problem, here?
So, what say you all? At what point do we have the right to step in and mandate that someone else take medication–of any kind? Do we wait until they’re harming themselves and/or others? That seems to be what happens currently, and results in involuntary commitments…what if we could get to the problem and treat it before someone had to crash hard, possibly taking other people down with them? And at what point do “we” step in? I’m wondering how you get a diagnosis on someone who is totally non-compliant in the first place. Seems like someone would have to have run up against “the system” at least once, resulting in, at the very minimum, a 72-hour hold, in order to be diagnosed with a mental illness. I can easily see a “slippery slope” argument here, too. If we can mandate treatment for one thing, then why not another, and another, until we’ve reached Brave New World status?
But then, I see so many people homeless, sick, miserable, addicted to drugs and/or alcohol, having lost everything…when just straightening out some brain chemistry might have given them completely different lives, if only.
It’s a good topic for discussion, and I’m going to be doing some more research into Kendra’s Law, to try and figure out the details. I don’t know what kind of “teeth” it has, or what the consequences are for non-compliance, or what criteria must be met to have it put into play. I thank God regularly that my husband is one of the “lucky” ones (Yeah, I know–funny, huh? Ha, ha.) who doesn’t have any compliance issues…but you know what? When he was undiagnosed, unmedicated, and unstable? He didn’t HAVE any insight, wasn’t capable of recognizing his illness. He had to first “hit bottom,” and be involuntarily hospitalized and medicated first. Even then, he was not initially treated correctly in the beginning, and suffered a relapse, and yet another involuntary hospitalization. That was the one that saved his life, and he’s been pretty stable for almost 4 years now. And I have to ask myself, is what he went through back then really that different from what Kendra’s Law proposes? The only real difference I can see is that once my husband was released from the hospital, there was nothing in place to ensure that he kept taking his meds–he was free to get off them and start cycling again at any time, as he is now. Fortunately, he doesn’t misinterpret “feeling better” with “being well.” But he’s not in the majority there.
If you have someone in your life who suffers from a mental illness, but who can’t recognize that fact, and it drives you to distraction, there are two sources I strongly recommend, both from Dr. Xavier Amador. One is his fantastic book, “I Am Not Sick; I Don’t Need Help,” and the other is this amazing lecture on the topic of anosognosia (lack of insight). This video can honestly change the way you look at mental illness, and in my opinion, applies in good measure to addiction, as well. Amador is inspirational, and speaks not only as a healthcare professional, but as the loving brother of a schizophrenic who refuses treatment. Do yourself a favor and block off a couple hours of time to view this lecture. Heck, even if you have to view it in 15-minute chunks here and there, it is SO worth your time.